Sunday, May 7, 2023

I THINK I WAS A TRUE BELIEVER. I THOUGHT CANADA HAD A SEAMLESS AND NON DISCRIMINATORY JUSTICE SYSTEM. I HAD THOUGHT THAT IF ANY LAW HAD BEEN BROKEN AND DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE CROWN OR THE COMMONWEALTH OR TO A PERSON OR TO PROPERTY OR TO THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND THE EVIDENCE OR THE SIGHT OF THAT LAW BREAKING AND RESULTANT DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED BY ANY LAW OFFICER, THAT OFFICER WOULD BE OBLIGED TO ACT TO HELP THE DAMAGED PARTY BY LAYING CHARGES, REPORTING THE INFRACTION TO AUTHORITIES AND ASSISTING THE DAMAGED PARTY TO OBTAIN RESTITUTION AND REMEDY.

I HAVE BEEN LET DOWN, IGNORED, DISENFRANCHISED, DISAPPOINTED.


I HAVE HAVE RECEIVED LITTLE OR NO COMPENSATION FOR MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH INJURY, A TINY FRACTION OF THE EQUIVALENT OF MY LOSS OF EARNINGS FROM THE RESULTANT UNEMPLOYMENT.


SERIOUS DAMAGE WAS DONE TO MY OTTER POINT HOMES, ONE WAS BURNT DOWN AND THE SECOND HOME SITS IN A DEVASTATED HOLE. MY PROPERTY WAS STRIPPED OF TREES AND SOIL, THERE IS A DAM STOPPING MOST OF THE CREEK FLOWS AND A 17 FOOT DEEP UP TO 100 FOOT WIDE DITCH BISECTS MY ONLY FLAT LAND FOR HUNDREDS OF FEET.

I TRIED TO START TO OBTAIN REMEDY BY LITIGATING UNDER THE WATER ACT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  UP TO THE  ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CABINET.


THE RCMP AND BC PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS BEGAN TO TRY TO GET ME FOR SOMETHING INSTEAD OF ACTING ON OBVIOUS AND STILL VISIBLE DAMAGE DONE TO MY PROPERTY WHICH I TRIED TO REMEDY THROUGH LITIGATION. 


THERE HAD BEEN CRIMINAL OFFENCES COMMITTED ON THIS LOT A AT OTTER POINT PREVIOUSLY AND WHEN THERE WAS THE ARSON OF MY FIRST HOUSE THE RCMP IGNORED THIS GENERALLY ACCEPTED SOURCE OF SUSPICION THAT THE PREVIOUSLY CRIMINAL OFFENDERS WERE LIKELY TO BE RESPONSIBLE.


DEFAMATION AND FALSE ACCUSATION CREATE A BOGUS CHARACTERIZATION OF MYSELF WHICH FORMS A RECORD THAT DESPITE MY DISPROVING ALL OF IT IS USED AND ACTED ON BY THE POLICE. 

No comments:

Post a Comment