THE LINKING OF RECOLLECTIONS PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS CONTEMPORANEOUSLY

TOTAL RECALL IS A MANY SPLENDORED THING RUNNING IN THE BACKGROUND ALL THE TIME, REMEMBERING IN VIVID SOUND AND COLOR, LINKING EVENTS FROM THE PAST, NOW. THE PAST NOW.

I DO NOT EXPERIENCE PAIN. IT COULD BE ASKED THAT IF IT IS NOT PAIN, WHAT FORCES ME TO LAY FLAT ON MY BACK WITH MY LEGS AND TORSO SLIGHTLY ELEVATED. WEIGHT IS WHAT IT FEELS LIKE, TONS AND TONS OF CRUSHING WEIGHT WHEN I TRY TO STAND UP.

To be clear about pain: burns momentarily burn; bangs can actually be painful or numbing; I can feel electric shock type sensations in my right elbow but very rarely.

A person I knew a few years back said: "The Judge thought your claim was ridiculous, awarded you a settlement for pain you imagined." That is demeaning!

Demeaning indeed but it had to be a vicious and ludricous fantasy, a Bad Dream indeed. I can't stand for very long at the best of times, I am virtually paralyzed at worse times and the worst of times are worse than one who had not had this has experienced. Pain could be worse than defecateing and barfing simultaneously.

FOR A LONG TIME I HAD THOUGHT THE ACCUSER HAD FABRICATED HIS RECOLLECTION. COULD THE JUDGE REALLY HAVE SAID THAT?

It in actuality does not matter. The entire gambit reeks of the arrogant dismissiveness of impotent persons exercising power and desirous of making you feel like absolutely powerless non performing crap while they do it.

I was recalling the words of Charles Phippen when he admitted there were set deals made before plaintiffs went to court, but they still paid to do it and had to go. The insurance company lawyer had lied to my Lawyer who was part of the old deal where lawyers did not lie to each other and did not know about the new lying lawyers. I took a BC Supreme Court action over prevarication and conspiracy to obstruct justice by lawyers, police and orchestrated by the Crown Corporation The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. That is Criminal Insanity! 

WHEN THE JUDGE KNOWS THAT THERE IS A SET DEAL WHAT WOULD THE COMMENTARY BE ABOUT MY "IMAGINARY"  PAIN?

I DO BELIEVE THAT I WAS SAID (A PASSENGER IN THE ACCIDENT) TO BE ``ACCIDENT PRONE`` WHICH WAS POSSIBLY VERBALLY CLOSE ENOUGH HOGWASH FOR A BUNCH OF SCIENCE DENYING DRUNKS AND DRUG ADDICTS TO ESPOUSE. THEY ARE  IN CHARGE OF THE CONDUCT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS BUT IT SURE AS HELL DOES NOT REFLECT ANY RATIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT COULD CAUSE AN ACCIDENT.