MEN TOO

THIS POST COULD BE ON BOTH OF THESE blogs@blogspot.

DITZKREIG

I DID, JUST YESTERDAY, CORRELATE A COUPLE OR THREE MEMORIES:

I RECALLED HOW I WAS "BAD MOUTHED": USING DEROGATORY TERMS TO DESCRIBE ME WAS ALL THERE WAS TO THE DEFAMATION.

I WAS SUPPOSEDLY AN "ABUSIVE" HUSBAND. WOULD NONE OF THE USUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSING BE EXHIBITED AND STILL THE BASELESS FABRICATIONS ABOUT MYSELF WERE ACCEPTED AND COMMUNICATED AND ACTED UPON?

HERE IS A TRUMP CARD IN THIS GAME OF DECEPTION. IF I WAS AN "ABUSIVE" HUSBAND AND PARENT WOULD I NOT HAVE TO EXHIBIT SOME SIGNS OF "CONTROLLING"? 

I WAS KNOWN, I WAS TOLD YEARS LATER, BY SOOKE TEENAGERS AS ONE OF TWO ADULTS WHO IT WAS SAFE TO DIVULGE INFORMATION TO TO GET ADVICE.

WHEN I MADE THIS HEAD I DID NOT KNOW HER  HAIR WAS DYED BUT BY THE TIME THIS HEAD WAS ANIMATED WHO KNOWS. I ENTIRELY MANUFACTURED THAT HAIR.

MY EX-WIFE DYED HER HAIR BLONDE SECRETLY AND I NEVER PRIED OR SPIED OR CONTROLLED HER ENOUGH TO KNOW SHE DYED HER HAIR. I NEVER KNEW BUT I WAS TOLD ABOUT IT AFTER SHE LEFT ME AND I REMEMBER THE SPRING OF '75 WHEN SHE ARRIVED WITHOUT HAIR ROPE HAIR, WITH SOFT AUBURN TRESSES AND I SAID "YOUR HAIR, IT IS SO NICE AND SOFT AND SHINY". "I HAVEN'T BEEN IN THE SUN" SHE SAID. I CONCERNED MYSELF WITH REMEMBERING WHOSE WAX HAD BECOME WHAT CASTING AND PLAYING HARMONICA AND WRITING SARCASTIC SATIRICAL POEMS AND DOING A BIT OF PAPER MACHE'.

ENTITLED AND BESIDES OTHER PEOPLE HAVE MORE THAN THEY DO

BELIEVE IT OR NOT SOME WOMEN AND A FEW MEN HAVE ACTUALLY COLLECTED, NOT INHERITED, BUT MANIPULATED, THIS MUCH CASH, WORK FREE, OUT OF THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM AND SOMETIMES EVEN MORE OUT OF HUSBANDS THROUGH DIVORCE. 

THERE ARE A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE WHO WILL MILK EVERY GOVERNMENT OR FAMILY TEAT THAT THEY CAN REACH.

I WAS BEMUSED IN THOUGHT EARLY THIS MORNING AND INTO MY SEA OF CONSCIOUSNESS THERE FLOATED THE REALIZATION THAT THOSE WHO DRAIN EVERY TEAT ALSO REFUSE TO MAKE ANY SUPPORTIVE CONTRIBUTION TO FAMILY OR GOVERNMENT OR FATHERS FOR SURE.

IT IS NOT JUST ONLY WOMEN WHO ACT LIKE THIS. THERE ARE EXPLOITATIVE MEN AND CULTURES AND AGENCIES WHERE MEN MILK THE SYSTEM AND DISPOSSESS OTHER PEOPLE OF RIGHTS AND PROPERTY AND THEIR ENTERPRISE.

THIS WEEK I AM WITNESSING THE ACTIONS OF A MAN WHO MILKED THE SYSTEM AS HARD AS HE COULD AND WILL CONTINUE TO COLLECT A SUBSIDY FROM GOVERNMENT DESPITE BEING EMPLOYED FULLY NOW AND HAVING EARNED MONEY WORKING AS MUCH AS ANYONE I KNOW WHILE REFUSING TO EVER PAY ONE DOLLAR OF INCOME TAX.

THE EXTRAORDINARY LIGHTHEADEDNESS OF LAWYERS.

BARBARA YATES SAID TO MY EX-WIFE "IF YOU WANT MONEY YOU ARE BETTER OFF WITH HIM DEAD OR DIVORCED." JUST GREAT FOR MY FUGUE TO HEAR THAT. 

I HAD BEEN IN A HEAD CRACKING CAR ACCIDENT CAUSED BY A LEFT TURNING NEGLIGENT IN 1986.

ANY PROPER STUDY OF MY HISTORY WOULD UNCOVER THE FACT THAT MY EX-WIFE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO ANYTHING IN A DIVORCE ACTION.

FIRST, EARL SHAW, WHY WOULD YOU SEND ME TO BARBARA YATES?

I CAME TO SEE YOU BUT I WAS SO DAMNED FUGUED  THAT IT WAS ALL  I COULD DO JUST TO GET TO YOU. I DID WHAT YOU TOLD ME TO DO. 

"ICBC WANTS TO PAY ME $3000 FOR MY TIME AND YOU WILL GET A $0 SETTLEMENT" SAID BARBARA YATES. "ICBC SAYS YOU ARE WORTHLESS".

I NEVER HAD A HIGH TAXABLE INCOME. I HAD TAX FREE CAPITAL GAINS IN THE GOLD BUSINESS I WAS IN. I BUILT TWO HOUSES WITH MY LABOR DOING A LOT OF FINISHING WHICH DOES NOT GENERATE A T4.

EVEN WHEN I WORKED AT THE CAR LOT I WAS USUALLY FINISHING A HOUSE OR FIGHTING FOR MY FIRE INSURANCE AS WELL. MY WRITING AND MUSICAL SKILLS WERE IGNORED. ALL OF THIS CREATED NON TAXABLE WEALTH. ALL MODEL CREATION IN THE JEWELRY BUSINESS WAS NON TAXABLE WEALTH.

I SAVED MYSELF FROM EX-WIFE CREATED UNDER WATER INSOLVENCY TWICE BY THE TIME I MET YATES.

BARBARA YATES SHOULD LISTEN TO HER CLIENT, NOT THE INDEMNIFYING AGENCY WORKING FOR A NEGLIGENT.

I RECALL THE UNDERLYING CRIME MY EX-WIFE CREATED WHEN SHE SAID "SIGN OVER ALL OF YOUR ASSETS OR I WILL SAY YOU ABUSED ME".

THAT MEANS EVERYONE WHO AIDED HER IN FALSITY TO DISENABLE ME IS GUILTY OF AT LEAST OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. 

MEMORY IS NOT ALL THAT IS REQUIRED TO UNDERSTAND THE HERE AND NOW. THE PRESENT IS ENTIRELY COMPOSED OF THE EVENTS WHICH OCCURRED IN THE PAST. UNDERSTANDING HOW THIS CAME ABOUT REQUIRES CORRELATION.

MY SISTER JOANNE COLLARD (NOW PHILLION, Phd CURRICULUM STUDIES) SAID "YOU THINK YOU ARE SO SMART BUT WE FIXED YOU". "YOU WERE GOING TO INHERIT UNCLE ALBERT'S HOUSE AND HIS MONEY AND WE FIXED THAT!" 

SHE ALSO SAID WHAT IS ANIMATED IN THE VIDEO AT THE PAGE TOP.

I JUST THOUGHT ABOUT WHAT TWO PEOPLE SAID ABOUT THE SAME EVENT.

I HAD REMEMBERED WHAT EACH PERSON SAID. I HAD NOT NOTICED THAT THE TWO VERSIONS OF THE SAME EVENT POINTED TO AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT MOTIVATION FOR THE ACTIONS TAKEN TO HIDE AN INHERITANCE FROM ME AND TO STEAL IT.

I THINK THAT IS WHAT THEY WERE UP TO. THEY WERE PROBABLY BOTH LYING!

MY BROTHER ANDREW SAID "MOTHER AND I DID NOT THINK YOU WOULD TRY HARD ENOUGH IF YOU KNEW YOU WERE GOING TO INHERIT ALBERT'S MONEY".

People are Stupid- Loopy And Loop-ed

I subtly make people offers where I can benefit them and they look my gift horse in the opposite end to the one in the proverb and fail to take advantage of what I am doing for them because it would cost me little and benefit them a lot.

THAT WAS THE CALCULATION I MADE WHEN MY EX-WIFE WANTED MY HOUSE AND MY AMPLIFIERS AND HARMONICAS TO SELL OFF CHEAP AND LEAVE ME PENNILESS. I WOULD HAVE TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT TO TRY TO SUPPORT MY CHILDREN AND GET RID OF WIFE CONTROL AS I DEMANDED IN MY LETTERS TO HER LAWYER. 

I RECRUITED MY BROTHER, WHO I DID NOT TRUST MUCH ALREADY BUT WE WERE IN CONTACT IN 1990. HE AGREED TO BUILD MY EX-WIFE ONE OF THE $70,000 TO BUILD, 70 CHOICES OF HOMES IN A PROSPECTIVE BOOK OF HOUSE PLANS FOR SALE. 

SHE WANTED TO PLINK ME OFF OF MY HOME, NOT THAT USEFUL OUT HERE AT OTTER POINT WITH KIDS. SHE IMAGINED SHE WOULD SELL THIS TAINTED BY LINDON HOUSE AND BUT A WONDERFUL NEW SPECIAL BETTY HOUSE. 

I WAS GOING TO ADD TO FAMILY ASSETS ALTHOUGH SHE HAD NOTHING DUE HER I WAS GOING TO SUPPLY A MORTGAGE FREE HOME THAT MY CHILDREN COULD LIVE IN. I WANTED HER TO GET HER FATHER TO SET HER UP TO BORROW THE JUST $14K A LOT COST AND FOR HER TO THUS OWN AND PAY A SMALL ($300/ MO,?) MORTGAGE  ON THE PROPERTY AND GET THE ACCOMMODATION SUPPORT PAYMENTS FROM SOCIAL SERVICES. 

SHE REFUSED MY OFFER SAYING "I AM NOT GOING TO DO WHAT YOU GUYS WANT ME TO DO."I HAVE DECIDED, I AM GOING TO MAKE LIFE AS HARD AS POSSIBLE FOR YOU".

EVERYTHING THAT PROCEEDS FROM THAT STATEMENT OF CRIMINAL INTENT IS A CRIMINAL ACT AND ALL OF MY EX-WIFE BETTY COLLARD OR TRIXIE DASHEVSKY'S LITTLE HELPERS ARE CRIMINALS ENGAGED IN A MALICIOUS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE WHICH MY EX-WIFE HAD DECLARED WAS " BECAUSE I HATE YOU" SHE SAID " I HATE ALL MEN, I HATED MY FATHER".

YOU GOT INVOLVED IN A HATE CRIME, PEOPLE WHO ARE STUPID AND LOOP-ED.

I REMEMBER ME LAYING THERE JUST LIKE TODAY SEVERAL TIMES IN THE PAST. OTHER EVENTS MARK THE TIME WHEN OTHERWISE IT WOULD ALL BE THE SAME JUST LAYING THERE VIRTUALLY PARALYZED.

TOTAL RECALL ALLOWS ME TO UNDERSTAND WHAT HAPPENED.

I CAN SEE A THEORY OR  A THEOREM, WHICH CATEGORIZES EVENTS THAT OCCURRED MANY YEARS APART CHRONOLOGICALLY BUT WHICH HAVE SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS. 

THE OPPORTUNITY AFFORDED BY TOTAL RECALL CAN AID IN THE UNDERSTANDING ABOUT HOW AND WHY PERIODS OF VIRTUAL PARALYSIS OCCUR AND PERSIST.

I AM VIRTUALLY PARALYZED NOW IN THE SAME NEAR TOTALLY  INCAPACITATING TONIC IMMOBILITY STATE. AT TIMES THE SWAYBACK, A REVERSE ARCHING OF THE BACK IS THE PREDOMINANT DISABLING FACTOR. IN 1968 AND FROM 1970 TO 1974 I WAS VIRTUALLY PARALYZED AS I AM NOW. WHAT IS NOTABLE AND VIVIDLY MEMORABLE WAS MY 2001 SEPTEMBER 11th LAYING IN BED WITH WORSE THAN TODAY IN INTENSITY BUT VERY SIMILAR IN EFFECT "VIRTUAL PARALYSIS", AS I KNEW IT THEN. I HAD TO LAY THERE IN SILENCE AND DARKNESS BUT I ROLLED OVER AND I SWITCHED ON THE TV.

I WAS JUST IN TIME TO SEE THE SECOND JET CRASH INTO THE SECOND TOWER.

I keep coming back to where I try to figure out when the Collard Family Women`s gang had their first meeting about me.

MY EX-WIFE WENT UP THE ROAD IN 1982 OE 1983 TO JOIN UP WITH THE REDNECK GANG. SHE SAID SHE HAD TOLD THEM EVERYONE ELSE'S SIDE OF ANY CONFLICT I HAD BEEN IN.

( LIKE MY YEARS LONG FIGHT AGAINST A PHONY EVICTION FROM THE BURR HOUSE.)

THE REDNECKS WERE PRACTICING THEIR HATRED AND EXCLUSIONISM BEFORE I ARRIVED AT OTTER POINT.

THE REDNECKS UP THE ROAD MET CONSTANTLY AND THEY PRE-HATED ME.

ALL I HAD DO DO WAS WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS MOVE IN TO THE FIRST OTTER POINT HOUSE. I DID NOT. 

"I SHOULD HATE YOU " SAID IRELAND. "YOU LIVE IN THE HOUSE OF THE MAN THAT GOT US BUSTED."

IRELAND AND OTHER REDNECK GANG MEMBERS HAD STRIPPED MY HOUSE OF COPPER WIRE, COPPER PIPE, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES, THE WELL PUMP AND THE PRESSURE TANK AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE. ( THE HOUSE HAD BEEN LIVABLE, AND FUNCTIONAL. MERX HAD LIVED THERE WITH HIS FAMILY.) I REMEMBER I HAD SEEN A MORE EQUIPPED HOUSE WITH HEATERS AND A  WATER SYSTEM. THE LOOTING CAUSED ME TO HAVE A LONGER AND MORE EXPENSIVE HOUSE FINISHING TO ACCOMPLISH BECAUSE OF THIS. 

I ACTUALLY HAD TO SLEEP IN MY SCHOOL BUS AS THE HOUSE WAS DUSTY AND IT REEKED OF VARNISH AT OTHER TIMES.

***********************************************************

THE COLLARD FAMILY WOMEN`S GANG WAS ALWAYS CUTTING AWAY MY FINANCIAL SUPPORT. MY MOTHER STOLE EVERYTHING I HAD OR GOT, EVEN MY MAIL. THAT STARTED AS EARLY AS 1958 AND MY EX-WIFE STOLE MY MAIL UNTIL SHE LEFT WITH EVERYTHING I HAD IN 1990.

WHEN DID THEY HAVE THE FIRST MEETING:

WHILE I WAS WORKING MY JEWELRY  FACTORY FROM A ROLLER CHAIR? 

[1974 TO 1979 I DRIPPED WITH CHEAP JEWELRY. CHEAP, EXPENSIVE, IF IT IS REAL GOLD AND SILVER IT WORKS.]

WHILE I WAS CONVERSING AT THE ROUND TABLE AT THE BURRVILLA OR WHILE I WAS HOSTING MUSIC SESSIONS?

WERE THEY MEETING TO DECLARE I WOULD NEVER, IN 1974, GET BURRVILLA OPERATING AS A HOME AND FOR MUSIC?

WHEN DID THEY FIRST MEET TO START STRIPPING MY INHERITANCES FROM ME?

I KNOW THEY WERE MEETING AND CRIMINALLY CONSPIRING TO HAMPER ME AND TO SAY I WOULD NOT FINISH THE FIRST OTTER POINT HOUSE BY 1979.

DID THEY PREDICT I WOULD FAIL AT THE SECOND HOUSE AT OTTER POINT TOO?

THEY HAD A MEETING DECLARED TO TAKE ME DOWN BY 1984 AND THAT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE AS ALL HAMPERING IS MALFEASANCE AND THEREFORE IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE TO DO THAT.

THE COLLARD FAMILY WOMEN'S CRIMINAL GANG  WERE MEETING LONG BEFORE THE RED LETTERED MEETING ABOVE  IN 1984. I HAVE TO KNOW WHEN AND WHERE AND ABOUT WHAT. ( ABOUT RIPPING ME OFF, I BET.)

PULL ME IN, SUCK ME DRY AND SPIT ME OUT, RIGHT

I RECALL THAT IF I HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO PURSUE MY INTERESTS AND TO KEEP THE MONEY MY RELATIVES GAVE TO ME AS A CHILD I WOULD HAVE BEEN JUST FINE AND IF I HAD GOTTEN MY UNCLE ALBERT'S HOUSE AND HIS MONEY AS I WAS WILLED THAT I WOULD HAVE BEEN FREE TO DO MY ART, WRITING AND MUSIC.

I WANTED TO PURSUE MY ART. IF I GOT THE MONEY I WAS GIVEN, I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO PUT ALL THOSE HOURS INTO WORKING NOT AT  MY ART. 

ONE MIGHT SAY, SO WHAT.

UNFORTUNATELY I HAVE ENDED UP ISOLATED FROM MY ACQUAINTANCES AND IN ADDITION I HAVE DE FACTO BEEN KICKED OUT OF MY FAMILY BY WOMEN WHO MARRIED INTO THE COLLARD FAMILY AGAIN. ALL OF THE WOMEN WERE RIGHT THERE FAMILYING IT UP WHEN I WAS TO INHERIT MONEY OR HAD A TRUST FUND OR A BANK ACCOUNT.

A letter to A.P.

 I would be bewildered as to why people would involve themselves negatively in my affairs.

Your theory was that they wished to have sex with me.

You would be right about men wanting to have sex with you. Some wanted more, like control or even to wipe the smile off your face as if they thought you were smug or laughing at them.

The women who interfered did not wish to have sex with me except for very few, they wanted to have me in the position of control by them which they would have if I was having sex with them.

In addition, if illicit sex could be alleged, suddenly an exacting ethical landscape was created.  What about the ethics of  and the moral deficiency of  the origin of the entire encounter or non-encounter being the false creation of their being in danger or their having been exploited ? Some Women would assume that role and position even when I was not having sex with them or even in contact with them. The basis and the historical origin of the Fake 911 call is " Woman in danger from sex partner or attempted sex partnering ".

If the bad interfering people could not have you for sex or more, or control over me, they would flip control to destructive powers and persons to destroy each of us if they could not have us under their control and domination.

Persons dependent on us or even just in the vicinity could be seriously damaged but the malfeasants do not care.

Same sex attacks could be a product of Jealousy and Envy as well, and the hatred could be of an imagined wealth or privilege and it could be so wrong and so misplaced. Attacks include rigorous defaming of the person whom they are jealous of.

You do not know the quarter of the Nonsensical Criticisms of yourself I had to rebut.

ABOUT CNN

I WAS SITTING LATE AT NIGHT, THINKING, "LES ENFANTS TERRIBLE'" RAIL AT A "GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AGENDA"

IN CANADA NO LESS. WITH CNN BEING AN AMERICAN NEWS OUTLET I AM DUBIOUS.

WHEN YOU GET THE JOB YOU HAVE TO DO WHAT THE CUSTOMER OR OWNER OF GOODS OR THEIR PERSON WANTS YOU TO DO.

 

WHEN I JOINED THE CNR THESE WERE 

OUR COLOURS. 

ALL OF US WHO WORKED AS I DID, IN SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS, AT THE  CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD ASSIDUOUSLY PURSUED THE SAME GOAL, WHICH WAS TO MAKE SURE EVERY PERSON AND ITEM WE TRANSPORTED ARRIVED INTACT AND WHERE AND WHEN THE CUSTOMER HAD REQUIRED OUR SERVICE TO THE CANADIAN PEOPLE.

WE KNEW THAT OTHER PEOPLE'S PROJECTS AND SAFETY COULD NOT BE JEOPARDIZED WHILE WE WERE IN CHARGE OF THE VEHICLE AND WE WERE IN CHARGE OF THE LOAD AND WE WERE CHARGE OF THE ROAD AND THE BRIDGES AS WELL, IN DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS I WORKED IN. 

WHEN WOMEN TOOK CONTROL THROUGHOUT MY LIFE, MY PROJECTS AND MY NEEDS AND ASPIRATIONS WERE NOT ONLY NOT ALLOWED TO PASS THEIR CONTROL BUT MY PROJECTS  WERE DELIBERATELY AND WILLFULLY DESTROYED. 

WHEN I INHERITED MONEY, I WAS SIMPLY BLINDSIDED, I WAS NOT THERE, MOTHER STOLE MY DOCUMENTS AND I ENDED UP LOSING SEVERAL INHERITANCES WHICH EVERYONE KNEW I WOULD USE TO ADVANCE MY ART MUSIC AND WRITING.

LATER I OWNED MY OWN PROPERTY BUT I COULD NEVER DO ANYTHING WHICH WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SAFETY AND SUPPORT OF MY CHILDREN, JUST LIKE AT THE CNR WHERE WE HAD TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING AND ALL THEIR PLANS WERE SUPPORTED AND KEPT SAFE ON THE CNR . 

AS A FAMILY MAN I WAS LIMITED IN MY MANEUVERABILITY. 

I COULD NOT SELL OUT AND LEAVE TOWN WITH MY ASSETS WHEN MY WIFE STARTED MY EXTORTION THROUGH THREATENING MY DESTRUCTION BY A DIVORCE ACTION AFTER ONLY EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF MARRIAGE WITH ONE CHILD AND ANOTHER ON THE WAY AS MY WIFE HAD DESIRED AND "NEEDED". 

FACEBOOK ONLY ACKNOWLEDGES ONE ACCOUNT THAT OF Lindon Collard but But BUT ALL OF THESE CHARACTERS blogs AND Channels are the originating source of all the posts on Facebook attributed to Lindon Collard.

 THERE ARE A WHOLE LOT MORE OF THESE CONTRIBUTORS ON YOUTUBE.

• 

  

  
  DRUNKY
  COCAMO

  drunkycocamo@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 
  
• 

  LlNDON Collard               

  

  
  

  braycacklebray@gmail.com
  
  

   

  
  

  Signed out

  
  
• 

  LIVE ROCK CRITIC

  liverockcritic@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 

  LINDON COLLARD                                        

  

  
  

  capriciousjustice@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 
  
• 
  
• 

  Lindon Collard

  lindoncollard@gmail.com
• 

  MARIJUANA CRITIC

  marijuanacriticcanada@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 

  
  
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 

  Marijuana Wars

  warsmarijuana@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 

  Canadacomplaint Commission

  canadacomplaintcommission@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 
  
• 
  
•  
• 

  TORTURE CANADA

  torturecanada@gmail.com

  Signed out
• 

  Bull Rush

  bullrushfrog@gmail.com

  I
• i 
• 
  
•